Recent Posts

Hearst offer: Give up job security for $1,000, no raises after 7 years

More than a month after the Guild presented a comprehensive offer to settle the contract, Publisher George Hearst showed up Monday with his own ‘proposal.’

Employees would give up the right to any say in who gets laid off and what work gets outsourced, and they would receive a $500 bonus upon ratification and another $500 to be paid on August 1, 2010.

No, we didn’t get the date wrong. The publisher walked in the door, said his offer from 2009 still stands, and didn’t even bother to update his wage offer.  He did not propose any raises for Times Union workers, who have gone without a pay increase for more than seven years.

The union made a comprehensive settlement proposal on July 31.

As a refresher, here is what we proposed:

WAGES: A 2 percent raise retroactive to August 1, 2010; 2.5 percent raises effective August 1, 2014; August 1, 2015, August 1, 2016; and August 1, 2017.

OUTSOURCING: Our proposal says the Company would have to negotiate over any outsourcing, as it has to do under the imposed conditions.

LAYOFFS. The Company could lay off employees out of seniority, but those workers would get enhanced severance. If the Company tried to take away the added severance, it would also lose the language allowing out-of-seniority layoffs.

As we see it, we have three options for a response we will outline at this meeting:

Membership meeting
12:30 p.m. Wednesday, September 24,
at the Colonie Town Library

  1. Buffalo Guild offers support to Lindsay Connors Leave a reply
  2. September’s Executive Board Meeting Leave a reply
  3. Clock ticking on contract talks at Times Union 1 Reply
  4. Lindsay Connors: Unafraid to do what’s right Leave a reply
  5. Please join us for the Labor Parade, next Friday Sept. 5 Leave a reply
  6. Guild still awaits Company response to settlement offer 1 Reply
  7. August’s Executive Board Meeting Leave a reply
  8. Guild proposes retro pay, raises 3 Replies
  9. Times Union losing staff to Gazette 1 Reply