• The Times Union wouldn’t meet its own standards to be named a top workplace

    The Times Union would not meet the standards it sets to be named a Top Workplace, according to a survey taken by the Newspaper Guild of Albany based on the TU’s own questions.

    A whopping 78.57 percent of respondents disagreed when asked if they feel genuinely appreciated. A total of 47.62 percent said they strongly disagreed.

    Another harsh assessment came on the issue of whether people had confidence in their future at the company. A total of 57.83 percent strongly disagreed and 80.72 percent disagreed to some extent.

    The worst grade of all came when employees were asked if they feel well-informed about how important decisions are made at the Times Union. An overwhelming total of 91.57 percent disagreed, 56.63 percent strongly.

    “The Top Workplaces section is an excellent annual description of what it means to be a great workplace,” Guild President Tim O’Brien said. “The stories describe places where the top executive stops regularly to say hello to employees, where communication is constant, where people feel engaged in the decisions that get made, where camaraderie is built through joint activities and where hard work is properly rewarded. The Times Union was once such a place. It isn’t now. Money isn’t the only answer, but the general public would be greatly surprised how little the Times Union resembles the workplaces it honors. This is a fixable problem if the leadership is willing.”

    All the questions were taken directly from the Times Union’s own Top Workplaces survey including whether people had confidence in the company’s leader. A total of 79.16 percent disagreed, 49.40 percent strongly.

    Individual managers fared better. A total of 57.15 percent agreed their manager cared about their concerns.

    Asked if their pay is fair, employees — who haven’t had raises in more than 7.5 years — overwhelmingly said no. Seventy-five percent said their pay isn’t fair, with 55.95 percent expressing strong feelings.

    While the TU wrote that a 35 percent employee response rate was enough to qualify, the Guild got much more than that. More than 47 percent of its members replied, a statistically excellent response.

  • Guild Executive Board post open and other updates

    Here is an update on several issues the Guild has been dealing with lately.

    Executive Board position available

    Our First Vice President, Bill Federman, retired. As was typical of his style, Bill wanted to leave quietly and with no fanfare. We appreciated Bill’s service on the board, his commitment to his colleagues and his great sense of humor. We salute our former Marine and thank him for the many ways he has served.

    That means we will need to fill his seat on our Executive Board. Maybe it could be you. Or maybe there is a colleague you think would do a great job. Please let us know if you’re interested or know someone. We would gladly answer anyone’s questions about what the role entails. It would be nice to get a representative from Circulation or the Business Office or anywhere else where we are not presently represented on the board. It involves attending a monthly meeting at the Labor Temple. You get to help us put together bargaining proposals, plan the picnic and holiday party, and help your colleagues when they need assistance. Most importantly, you get to be our eyes and ears. Ears are especially important. Listening to your co-workers is the most important job we board members have.

    If you’d like to chat about what the role entails, you can talk to any of our board members: Tim O’Brien, Marianne Mahr, Mark Hempstead, Brian Nearing, Jeff Boyer and Marci Schuck. Tim O’Brien can be reached at 466-8700.

    Buyout update

    The application period for the buyout has closed, and there were no takers. One small bit of good news is that one of the two Guild-covered employees in the magazine division, Colleen Ingerto, will be staying and moving downstairs. Sadly, the Times Union will be losing our colleague Emily Jahn next month. We appreciate Emily’s excellent work and wish her the best of luck wherever her career path takes her next.

    Guild Picnic

    Just a reminder, the Guild Picnic will be held June 14 at the Crossings park in Colonie. It’s free to Guild members and their families. Singles can bring a guest. We will be returning to our policy of printing tickets. You don’t need them to come, but they are a handy reminder. We’ll let you know when the tickets are available.

    As always, if you have any questions, concerns or need any help, please don’t hesitate to reach out.

  • Company settles legal case over delay in providing information to Guild

    The Company settled a legal case over its delay in providing information needed by the Newspaper Guild in defense of one of its members.

    The National Labor Relations Board had charged the Company with a failure to provide data in a timely manner to the Guild in the case over the firing of former ad salesperson Lindsay Connors. The Company had stonewalled the union, taking four months to provide relevant data the Guild had sought on the goals and revenues generated by employees in the same job title. The union had to press repeatedly to get the information and overcome attempts by the Company to claim the data was not relevant.

    Companies cannot set themselves up as being able to arbitrarily decide what information unions need in order to represent their members.

    Employees may notice signs posted in the building and on the Intranet that state the Company will not refuse to bargain collectively with the union by failing to provide information in a timely manner.

    While the union unfortunately lost the overall case over Lindsay’s firing, this settlement is important for all members because it is critical that the union get timely answers when defending its members.

    Under the settlement, the Company is required to post that it will abide by the law in providing information to the union in a timely manner. The post must remain up for 60 days.